More than half of a performance rating reflects the manager who wrote it. These cliff notes give you the 4 places reviews go wrong, 5 steps to write a review that’s fair and useful, how to write for a high performer and for someone who’s struggling, and what to say when your report disagrees.
Your Episode 338 cliff notes are on the way. If you don't see them in a few minutes, check your promotions or spam folder.
Six pages for the week you sit down to write reviews for your team. Work through it once per person before you open the review form.
Steven Scullen, Michael Mount and Maynard Goff looked at ratings for 4,492 managers, each rated by bosses, peers, direct reports and themselves. In their 2000 study in the Journal of Applied Psychology, the raters’ own tendencies explained 62% and 53% of the variation in ratings across the 2 data sets. The actual performance of the person being rated explained 21% and 25%.
For many leaders this is review season. Your report will read every sentence, act on some of it, and carry the rating into their HR file. A review built on the whole year, written in behavior and impact and checked against your own bias is one they can use.
If they read the sentence, do they know what to keep doing or change on Monday?
Episode 338 walks through where reviews go wrong, the 5 steps to write one, and how to run the conversation when your report disagrees, in about 19 minutes.
Listen to Episode 338